The TSA flaws exposed by the GAO were not really serious enough to deserve such fanfare. CBS' Bob Orr hyped the expose by asserting that "six full years after 9/11 US aviation remains a vulnerable target." But the improvised explosive device envisioned by the GAO would be useless in mounting a 9/11-style attack: it could not hijack four planes simultaneously nor crash them into skyscrapers. Worst case, Orr reported, was that the handmade bomb "could cause severe damage to an airplane and threaten the safety of passengers." NBC's Tom Costello (at the tail of his United-Delta merger videostream) concurred that such an explosion "would have caused significant damage to an airplane, possibly injuries or loss of life." On ABC, David Kerley (subscription required) noted that the GAO found no fault with airport terminal personnel: they "appeared to follow TSA procedures and used technology appropriately." The problem was that each of the bomb's components was, singly, both harmless and legal--and that there are "publicly available instructions" for its assembly.
You must be logged in to this website to leave a comment. Please click here to log in so you can participate in the discussion.