CBS' Bill Whitaker evoked the incendiary worries of civic leaders: dropping the torch in the middle of San Francisco, "one of the most politically active cities in the country, would be like dropping a match in kerosene." So instead they made the celebratory relay as hard to see as possible. Its whereabouts were concealed; its route was changed; the distance of the run was halved; and the closing ceremonies were held at an "undisclosed location." CBS' Whitaker called it a game of "hide the torch." ABC's Laura Marquez (embargoed link) marveled at a "remarkable piece of choreography." NBC's Peter Alexander saw torchbearers "escorted by a human shield of local police and Chinese paramilitary guards."
CBS anchor Katie Couric sought out David Wallechinsky, an historian of the Olympic Games. Referring to the secrecy and invisibility of the Olympic symbol, she inquired, reasonably: "Does this not defeat the whole point of the Olympic Torch relay?" "People fighting, pushing each other around, hiding it--that goes completely against the whole idea," he agreed. As for human rights abuses, they are no obstacle to the Games, Wallechinsky reminded us: just ten days before the 1968 opening ceremonies, "authorities shot to death about 250 people in the streets of Mexico City and they still went ahead with the Olympics anyway."
You must be logged in to this website to leave a comment. Please click here to log in so you can participate in the discussion.